One of my many duties as a personalfinanosaurus is to write articles which I distribute on the internet. I was posting an article on Article Hub, when I came across this article:

The story of a single man

So it might have been a cunning ploy to wind up over-sensitive females (with male alter-ego dinosaur personalities) like myself, but still, there could be a reason why Jack Crow was single for such a long time.

With quotes such as:

a female rarely says directly what she wants. Instead, she will use reverse psychology by asking the male a series of questions until she gets the desired answer. If she does not get the desired answer she will take the huffs and give the male ‘the cold shoulder treatment’. She thinks this will alert the male that something is wrong and he will do what she wants.with out actually telling him

and

This all stems back to the fact that a female thinks with her emotions, not logic. This is why a male cannot understand a females rational. Males cannot read between the lines. They are not psychic or clairvoyant and they need everything spelled out to them in black and white.

Males often also complain that females are moody, have mood swings and show irrational or erratic behavior. This is especially apparent in times of stress, emergencies or significant events where body chemicals and emotions are highly stimulated.

Because a females behavior is affected by her emotions and her emotions are affected by her body chemistry and her body chemistry is in a state of flux from one month to the next, it can only be expected that a female would exhibit erratic behavior that is a mystery to a man whose body does not go through a constant monthly cycle of change. Re-read that last paragraph guys if it went over your head.

Mr Crow is obviously entirely stupid himself or he’s dating stupid women.

As a woman who isn’t single – I would argue that a man who really knows what he’s talking about when it comes to women – is out there doing it – not fantasing in their own mono-blog

Related personalfinanosaurus posts:

1. £250,000 a lifetime for living the single life…

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8123-1093294,00.html

Barr debates the quarterlife crisis with gentle humour and brightened up a very bland morning at Cashzilla. As the tumbleweed blows across this blog, I thought the occasional visitor may take a look at the writing of Sir Barr for some light entertainment.

And some comments about the quarterlife crisis can be found here:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13809-1101541,00.html

But we shake our head at the comments from Mr Simon Gillet in Edinburgh who states:

“I don’t know about anybody else, but the “quarterlife crisis” is as real as anything for me. I’m 29, with two degrees, £20,000 of debt, and two part-time jobs to pay it off. Neither earns me enough to live on, let alone pay off my debts, because I’m studying for a still further degree, even though experience teaches that qualifications rarely lead to good jobs. Was it all a lie we were told? Why don’t good graduates move on to the kinds of jobs that society told us would be ours? Why isn’t education the royal road to riches and why have I spent the best years of my life being frustrated in a lecture theatre?”

Which begs the question, “why on earth are you on your third degree?”

Perhaps students really are less intelligent these days….

No related posts.